|
|
Is the source current
or out‑of‑date for your topic? Topic areas of continuing and rapid
development, such as the sciences, demand more current information. On the
other hand, topics in the humanities often require material that was written many years ago.
Is this a first edition or not?
Further editions indicate a source has been revised and updated to reflect
changes in knowledge, include omissions, and harmonize with its intended
reader's needs. Also, many printings or editions may indicate that the work has
become a standard source in the area and is reliable.
Note the publisher. If the source is published by a university press, it is likely to be scholarly. Although the fact that the publisher is reputable does not necessarily guarantee quality, it does show that the publisher may have high regard for the source being published.
Is this a scholarly or a
popular journal? This distinction is important because it indicates different
levels of complexity in conveying ideas.
Having made an initial appraisal, you should now examine the body of the source. Read the Preface to determine the authors intentions for the book. Scan the Table of Contents and the Index to get a broad overview of the material it covers. Note whether bibliographies are included. Read the chapters that specifically address your topic.
What type of audience is the author
addressing? Is the publication aimed at a specialized or a general audience? Is
this source too elementary, too technical, too advanced, or just right for your
needs?
Objective Reasoning
Is the information covered fact, opinion, or propaganda? It is not always easy
to separate fact from opinion. Facts can usually be verified; opinions, though
they may be based on factual information, evolve from the interpretation of
facts. Skilled writers can make you think their interpretations are facts.
Does the information appear to be valid and well‑researched, or is it questionable and unsupported by evidence? Assumptions should be reasonable. Note errors or omissions.
Is the author's point of view objective and impartial? Is the language free of emotion‑rousing words and bias?
Coverage
Does the work update other sources, substantiate other materials you have read, or add new information? Does it extensively or marginally cover your topic? You should explore enough sources to obtain a variety of viewpoints.
Is the material primary
or secondary in nature? Primary sources are the raw material of the research
process. Secondary sources are based on primary sources. For example, if you
were researching Adenauer's role in rebuilding
Writing Style
Is the publication organized logically? Are the main points clearly presented? Do you find the text easy to read, or is it stilted or choppy? Is the author's argument repetitive?
Evaluative Reviews
Locate critical
reviews of books in a reviewing source, such as Book Review Index or Book
Review Digest. Is the review positive? Is the book under review considered
a valuable contribution to the field? Does the reviewer mention other books
that might be better? If so, locate these sources for more information on your
topic.
Do the various reviewers
agree on the value or attributes of the book or has it aroused controversy among
the critics?
Learning how to quickly determine the relevance and
authority of a given resource for your research is one of the core skills of
the research process. For more assistance with the research process, consult
your instructor or a reference librarian.